Several people have asked my opinion of the Federal Reserve's new round of quantitative easing. In particular, some have noted that I did not sign the open letter by conservative economists critical of recent Fed actions.
My view is that QE2 is a modestly good idea. I say it is a "good idea" because, like Ben Bernanke, I am more worried at the moment about Japanese-style deflation and stagnation than I am about excessive inflation. By lowering long-term real interest rates below where they otherwise would be, QE2 should help expand aggregate demand. I include the modifier "modestly" because I don't expect these actions to have a very large effect.
Moreover, I do see some potential downsides. In particular, the Fed is making its portfolio riskier. By borrowing short and investing long, the Fed is in some ways becoming the hedge fund of last resort. If future events require higher interest rates, the Fed will end up making losses on its portfolio. And even if doesn't recognize these losses (by not marking to market), it could end up paying more interest on newly expanded reserves than it is earning on its newly acquired portfolio of long bonds. Such a cash-flow deficit could potentially undermine the Fed's political independence (which is already not very popular in some circles). Yet if the Fed tries to avoid these losses by failing to raise rates when needed, inflation could indeed become a problem down the road. I trust the team at the Fed enough to think they will avoid that mistake.
So, in the end, I judge QE2 to be a small but risky step in the right direction.
-----
Addendum: While I do not agree with its conclusion, I did find this video on QE2 amusing.
women clipart, women artist, digital women planner, digital women com daily, digital women printables, digital woman, digital women art, 3d women
Wednesday, 17 November 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(285)
-
▼
November
(40)
- 2010 Martha's Circle Holiday Gift Guide
- The Simpson-Bowles Social Security Plan
- giveaway week winners and reader discounts
- How to Improve Dodd-Frank
- Miss Plunkett Giveaway (CLOSED)
- Scoomer Giveaway (CLOSED)
- advent sew-along: week 4 - crunch time!
- Barro on QE2
- Ruffle Fabric Giveaway (CLOSED)
- Department of "Huh"? (Why Oh Why Can't We Have a B...
- Komfort Kids Holiday Blanket and Pillowcase Giveaw...
- Silhouette SD Giveaway! (CLOSED)
- Taxes, Spending, and Semantics
- coming up: a giveaway week!
- advent sew-along: your ornament questions answered
- The Progressivity of Bowles-Simpson
- advent sew-along: week 3
- QE2
- Hubbard on the Bowles-Simpson Tax Plan
- headbands, headbands, and more headbands
- crafting with the stars - vote for your winner!
- You Fix the Federal Budget
- Help me find the photographer
- advent sew-along: ornament templates
- hot chocolate gift tins
- The Simpson-Bowles Social Security Plan
- Good Signs from the Deficit Commission
- advent sew-along: week 2
- Raise the Early Retirement Age
- crafting with the stars - vote for round 3 projects!
- Thaler on the Estate Tax
- Laura Tyson and Me on NPR
- A QE2 Ditty
- birthday shirt, a new template, and updates
- Malkiel's Recommended Reading
- would you like to sew along with me?
- Feldstein on QE2
- moving on to round 3
- Is Obama a Keynesian?
- From Saturday's DC Rally
-
▼
November
(40)
No comments:
Post a Comment